General Meaning of A Passage to India
The question that the Indians discuss in Chapter 2 —
"Is it possible for the Indians to be friends with the English?" — is
the focal point of the plot of A Passage to India. Can East meet West on a
plane where each not only tolerates but also appreciates the other? In a larger
sense Forster asks if universal understanding is possible. (It should be
pointed out that this novel does not really suggest an affirmative answer to
that question.) He then proceeds to introduce characters from the major
factions in India and to show their interactions.
As he traces the interplay, he keeps before the reader
symbols that show forces above and beyond the reach of most men's grasp. The
sky and a hint of arches beyond it are prominent examples. To show that not
only are there heights which only the most perceptive minds can comprehend, but
also depths, he shows especially sensitive people finding beauty — and God — in
the lowest of creatures, the jackal and the wasp. Within this framework he
treats of three of the great religions, Islam, Christianity, and Hinduism.
Islam is shown in a decadent state reveling in past glory.
The Westernized Moslem finds it hard to maintain his belief. His festivals are
empty ceremonies in which the participants bicker about inconsequential matters.
Aziz, whom Forster chooses to represent Islam, professes to skepticism about
the precepts of his religion; his poetry is devoted to flamboyant exploits of
the past. All he appears to have left is a sadness because of the decline of
Islam, and a contempt for the Hindus.
The phrase that Mrs. Moore uses to describe Christianity,
"little talkative Christianity," seems to be Forster's view of that
religion. He chooses to use many biblical allusions, often in an ironic manner,
which point up what Christianity professes, but does not practice. The religion
of the English in India takes second place to affairs of state and does not
enter into the practical aspect of their lives; it is merely a conviction.
The events of the story lead the reader step by step to a
consideration of Hinduism. Professor Godbole, its main exponent, is pictured as
a man of peace, a man of wisdom, who refuses to become enmeshed in the petty
quarrels of men. The short climactic section at the end of the novel shows
Hinduism in action. The religious zeal of the participants in the festival
causes them at least to suspend momentarily, if not to disregard entirely, any
self-seeking for position as leader, even though the rajah is near death. The
adoration of the god is so intense that when the sick and aged rajah is brought
to the ceremony, he is scarcely noticed.
The ceremony includes ecstasy, merriment, and solemnity,
suggesting that religion should embody the whole of life. The biblical passage
"God is love" has an error in spelling, but none in practice. The
Hindus' faces are mild and serene, because "religion is a living force to
the Hindus," and among its tenets, one of the most important is the
"peace that passeth understanding." But Hinduism too has its imperfections;
Forster points out that in Mau, though there is no strife between Moslem and
Hindu, there is between Brahmin and non-Brahmin.
The key phrases in regard to the characters are "the
understanding heart." Aziz, warmhearted and impulsive, possesses
understanding, but his volatility reduces its effectiveness; Adela is cold,
honest, and reserved. Mrs. Moore has both kindness and an innate understanding
of people at the beginning of the novel, but the kindness at least does not
withstand her experience in the caves, and understanding without kindness is of
no use to her.
Fielding is the key figure who develops with the novel. He
not only crosses racial and national lines, but he responds as though they did
not exist. He professes atheism, but by the end of the novel he has at least
become personally aware of spiritual influences: puzzled by the pleasing change
in his wife after the encounter with Hinduism, he is intrigued by whatever it
is that the Hindus seem "to have found."
Professor Godbole is not so much a character as a
"carrier" for an ideology that suggests at least a theoretical answer
to the question Forster poses at the beginning of the book, "Can the
Indian be friends with the English?"
There is a historical aspect to this novel as well as a
religious one. Forster's premise seems to be that no nation can subjugate
another without inflicting wounds that leave deep scars. No nation can be of
service so long as the ruling nation holds itself superior and aloof. The book
is not a strictly historical account, of course, because Forster is more
concerned with social relationships than he is with history. But he does
indicate the spirit of rebellion that is beginning to build in India and shows
the English losing their grip on the government. The last few paragraphs of the
novel seem almost prophetic of Indian independence, which did not take place
until 22 years after the book's publication.
No comments:
Post a Comment